What is wrong with this picture?

On Tuesday, 12 January 2010 a massive earthquake stuck Haiti and in the resulting carnage nearly 1/4 million people died and many, many more were severely hurt or injured.

As a result of the falling debris and the nature of the Haiti infrastructure many of the injuries were the result of limbs being crushed or trapped and many, many people had to additionally endure the trauma of losing one or more of their limbs.

The UN and the World provided immediate relief and raised (somewhere in the region of) $500 million to donate to towards the rescue and recovery of the Haitian people.

In July 2010, following heavy monsoon rains in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sind, Punjab and Baluchistan regions of Pakistan widespread flooding of the Indus Valley occurred.

To date some 2000 people have died. (That is at least 228,000 less than died in Haiti 6 months earlier)

It is now reported that the UN is hoping to raise $2 billion (Source:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11351151) to donate to Pakistan to help with aid and recovery.

Am I wrong in seeing something wrong with this picture?

Nearly 1/4 million people die in a global catastrophe in Haiti and the UN Raises $500 million; A global catastrophe occurs in Pakistan and they want to raise $2 billion.

Is this a religious differentiation? Is it because Haiti is Christian and Pakistan is mainly Muslim and thus the UN is demonstrating religious discrimination?

I cannot equate the sought after donation by the UN with the scale of the catastrophes as the donations seem topsy-turvy to me.

What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Excellent (0)
  • Good (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Helpful (0)
  • Like (0)